Redesigning the compensation process from three separate forms to one adaptive flow
Delay compensation at Västtrafik originally consisted of three separate PDF forms sent by mail. When digitized, the structure was retained: three different web forms corresponding to three separate case types in customer service’s case management system. While digitization increased applications significantly (especially during the spring 2026 snow chaos), I identified a long-term usability risk: travelers had to first determine what type of case it was, rather than starting from their actual journey and what happened.
Two of the forms were almost identical, while the third (for Öresund train tickets) was difficult to communicate clearly. Tests showed many users didn’t even know they could apply for compensation for these trips. The fundamental question became: Can we start from the journey and let the form adapt based on user answers, rather than forcing users to understand our internal case categorization?
Instead of asking users to categorize their case type upfront, we let them describe their journey and what happened. The form then branches intelligently based on their answers, reducing cognitive load.
Customer service still receives three separate case types as before. The change was purely in the user’s path to data collection, not the organization’s process. This eliminated internal resistance.
The project was launched in Västtrafik Labs, a public test environment where new concepts can be tested in real context before permanent implementation. It provided valuable insights into how delay compensation can be structured more user-centrically without disrupting internal processes, and improved internal understanding of how mental models and case logic can differ.